Cole
Clark Lutherie
Complete Review of the Design and Manufacture

The factors that influence the ultimate
design of a guitar are varied, and include not just the
desired performance and playability goals but also the
many constraints that will be imposed upon the instrument.
The selection of materials and ornamentation are influenced
as much by availability and popular notions of aesthetics
as by structural and acoustic suitability.
One influential factor that may not at first appear
obvious is the availability of suitable (and suitably
inexpensive) manufacturing technology. As new manufacturing
technology becomes available in any field, it is generally
first exploited to perform analogs of more traditional
manufacturing processes. Such has been the case with
Computer Numerical Control (CNC) technology, which has
been used effectively as a substitute for more manual
processes in both large and small guitar shops. But as
more folks become more familiar with a new technology,
the tendency is to move beyond the mere substitution
of the new technology for an older one and to begin to
fully exploit its unique advantages. This process feeds
back into and affects the design of the manufactured
item.
Australian guitar manufacturer Cole Clark Guitars has
made efforts to fully exploit their CNC routing facilities,
and these efforts include substantial design changes
to the instrument itself. The company was started by
Bradley Clark who, with eleven years of guitar manufacturing
experience at Maton, Australia's largest guitar manufacturer,
and a bagful of new ideas, was able to attract financing
for this new venture. Having considerable experience
with three-axis CNC routers and conventional guitar construction,
Brad had developed some ideas on a totally new approach
to acoustic guitar design and manufacture. His basic
approach was to leverage CNC accuracy toward the development
of a manufacturing and assembly process that would significantly
reduce assembly time without compromising quality. Previous
experience in an automated manufacturing environment
indicated that the most basic dreadnought could be produced
with five to six labor hours over the course of a three
to six-week period. His goal was to reduce the assembly
time to just a few days.
At first Cole Clark assembled an eight person staff
and acquired a SCM 120 three-axis CNC machine with a
ten tool magazine. To get started, the company began
producing solid body electrics and lap steels, and also
started the design effort for a steel string acoustic.
In addition to the goal of reducing manufacturing time
and labor, goals for the acoustic also included using
CNC technology to enhance tone, balance, and volume;
achieving a level of playability equal to guitars at
the higher end of the market; and producing instruments
robust enough to stand up to working musicians.
 |
From the manufacturing perspective, all the above
needed to be delivered at price points that would
afford the company the chance to acquire enough
market share to endure viability. Prototypes of
the acoustic guitar were built and further development
took place with the aid of the new five axis CNC
machine, a Cosmic 6200. Photo 1 gives
some idea of the size of the machine.
The design of the
Cole Clark Guitar is radical in several aspects. Photo
2 shows a machined neck blank, which features
a jointed peghead and a Spanish heel. Slots are
machined into the heel for the sides, similar to
the system used in classical guitars. The neck
is the platform around which the guitar is constructed.
The CNC machinery allows the production of components
with a very high level of consistency. The allows
indexing the soundboard to the neck using its main
braces, the ends of which are pocketed into the
Spanish heel. The braces are let in shallow pockets
on the soundboard to precisely position them. Thus
neck alignment and action are guaranteed. Photos
3, 4, and 5 show the neck in detail. You
can see the slots on the top of the heel in Photo
4 that will accept the ends of the main
top braces. The two round holes are indexing holes
used to position the neck on its jigs.
|
The bracing pattern is designed to provide an optimum
strength-to-weight ratio. Photo 6 shows
the soundboard with the braces glued on. They are let
into the shallow pockets on a thicker-than-standard top
as shown in Photo 7, facilitating high
levels of consistency in brace location and ease of assembly.
The underside of the top is graduated to provide the
most responsive top plate without compromising strength.
Note the absence of finger braces. Graduation parameters
were arrived at through extensive testing. Tone,
balance, and volume all benefit from graduation. The
graduated tops are thicker around the braces. In this
way there is less wood where required: both strength
and flexibility are controlled. Carving soundboards in
this way optimizes weight and possible acoustic
efficiency. It also allows the routing of aspects,
such a trending for the braces, which aid assembly.
The braces are longer than the X braces of the Martin
tradition, and there are distinct possible advantages
in running braces more with the grain. The more the braces
run across the grain, the more the soundboard will move
up and down with changes in humidity. The more the braces
are aligned with the grain, the less the differential
of expansion, and therefore the least movement with humidity.
The point of the manufacturing system is not necessarily
the current top's unique bracing. The system did however
allow the rapid development of the current unique bracing.
Similarly the manufacturing system could provide for
equal-thickness sounboards. Again, the point of the system
in not necessarily graduated tops. Few at Cole Clark
question, however, that substantial gains have been made
by using the internally carved and graduated tops. Much
has certainly been learned from the practice.
Photos 8 and 9 show that, as with the
top, the back braces are let in to shallow pockets and
the back is also graduated. Graduation of the back marginally
reduces weight and makes a small but significantly positive
contribution to the guitar's sound. Note the absence
of a center seam graft. It takes minutes to fit a back.
There is no adjusting of the sides, or the applying,
leveling, or shaping of linings to match the back's curvature.
It is simple to vary the weight of the back. Generally
the weight is about a third less than that of
its conventional counterpart.
Photo 10 shows the groove in the top
plate to receive the sides. On assembly, the braced top
is attached to the neck on a fixture. Accuracy in locating
the top if facilitated by the fixture and the housing
of the main braces in the heel. Photo 11 shows
how the top and main braces fit into the neck heel. The
alignment fixture is not shown.
The top and back contain 3D grooves or shelf routings,
which match the curved geometry of the fitment to the
sides. There are no linings. Linings are time consuming
to fit and align, and add weight and adhesive. Since
the neck is fitted to the top and the sides in turn to
the neck and top, linings could easily be applied, face
to sides, either as continuous linings or as individual
strengthening pieces, consistent with some traditional
European-built instruments.
The current practice of not using linings, however,
has resulted in instruments at least as robust as higher-end
conventional guitars.
After the top is fitted to the neck, the bent sides
are fitted into grooves in the top and heel. A modified
fixture is used to accommodate models with a cutaway.
The sides are then reinforced and, where a top transducer
is required, this is fixed into place in a machined recess
(Photo 12). The back is then installed
by flipping the fixture and locating the sides in the
groove on the back.
Models that require binding are routed on a fixture
and fitted with wood binding approximately 0.7mm thick.
Although jogs to assist in the binding operation are
planned, binding is currently performed in a relatively
traditional manner. Cole Clark has an entry level instrument
in the production line, the FL1, which is unbound. On
this instrument the plate overhangs are simply trimmed
off flush with the sides.
At this point in construction the guitars are complete,
minus fingerboards and bridges. The same location holds
that were used to align the components to the manufacturing
jigs and which were used to align the instrument to the
assembly jigs are used to align the fingerboard and bridge
to the guitar. Fingerboard and bridge are fitted, and
then the guitar is finished. Since components are very
accurately produced and fit together precisely, very
little hand adjustment is necessary. The integrity of
fitment seems to improve acoustic performance as it does
manufacturing efficiency. There are no expensive or difficult-to-produce
body jigs used in the manufacturing and assembly processes.
Jigs are designed and drawn at the same time as the components
they hold, and are manufactured on the same CNC machine
that is used to rout the guitar parts.
Two general classes of jigs are used - CNC hold-down
jigs and assembly jigs. Assembly jigs have some similarity
with traditional Spanish assembly jigging. Most aspects
are relatively simple, but some jigging is proprietary
and some patented. There is a facility to replicate all
stages of jigging. Jigs are made to produce jigs. There
is an emphasis on the quick change of jigs and therefore
models. As it currently stands, it only takes minutes
to change from the production of acoustic to electric
guitars. This further facilitated by the fact that no
tool reset is needed on the CNC machine when changing
to production of a different instrument.
All components are presented to the CNC router as rectangular
stock and so this stock is relatively easily produced
and handled. This detail also adds to the efficiency
of the manufacturing operation.
Software used in the process includes various standard
off-the-shelf CAD and CAM software packages, and a good
deal of proprietary software as well. Drawings are generally
made using Rhino CAD software, the drawing facilities
of the EdgeCAM software package (which is also used to
run the machine), or AutoCAD.
Guitars can be assembled within 24 hours. This fast
potential assembly time provides advantages for production,
and it also provides advantages during development. Since
design iteration is mostly a matter of programming, new
prototype instruments with varying parameters can be
manufactured, assembled, and then tested and compared
in less than two days.
Three models of the acoustic are currently in production
with a new design in the pipeline. The models differ
primarily on materials and in level of ornamentation.
Cole Clark uses a number of native Australian wood species
as well as more traditional lutherie wood species. See
timbers page ...
Ultimately it is hoped the manufacturing system will
have the capacity to deliver customer-selected parameters
regarding sound. Meanwhile the company's desire to provide
their customers with value for money and affordable solid-wood
resonance. Ease of assembly of components and the use
of CNC technology in providing this outcome in some form
is inevitable. The process will to some degree demystify
instrument making and provide better understanding of
the components of sound production, which is expected
to lead Cole Clark to new patents. A new model acoustic
guitar incorporating some of those developments is currently
in the design phase.
Reference: American Lutherie - The
Quarterly Journal of the Guild of American Luthiers
Issue Number 83 / Fall 2005
|